top of page
  • Writer's pictureolivershearman

Grading harmful to learning

In our shared journey of molding young minds, it's crucial that we acknowledge the challenges posed by traditional assessments while also recognizing the potential in exploring alternative educational practices. The downsides of solely relying on large, harsh summative assessments have become apparent, and it's time for us to embrace alternatives that better align with the true essence of education—nurturing curiosity, creativity, and a lasting love for learning.

There are so many problems with examinations, while a traditional and widely used method of assessing students, can pose challenges that hinder creativity and contribute to various issues. Here are several reasons why examinations are often viewed as problematic for students and are seen to stifle creativity:

Focus on Memorization:

Examinations often prioritize the recall of information rather than the application of knowledge. This emphasis on memorization can discourage critical thinking and creativity, as students may prioritize rote learning over a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

Limited Assessment Methods:

Examinations typically rely on a narrow set of assessment methods, such as multiple-choice questions and essays. This limited scope may not effectively capture the diverse skills and talents of students, particularly those who excel in areas beyond written exams.

High-Stakes Pressure:

The high stakes associated with exams, especially those that significantly impact grades or academic progression, can create immense pressure on students. This pressure may lead to anxiety and a focus on simply "getting the right answer" rather than exploring the subject with creativity and curiosity.

Time Constraints:

Examinations often impose strict time limits, which can be challenging for students who require more time to process information or prefer a more thoughtful approach to problem-solving. The rush imposed by time constraints may hinder creative thinking.

One-Size-Fits-All Approach:

Examinations typically follow a standardized format, treating all students as if they learn and demonstrate their understanding in the same way. This one-size-fits-all approach may not cater to diverse learning styles and can limit creative expression.

Fear of Failure:

The fear of failure, amplified by the high-stakes nature of exams, can discourage students from taking risks or thinking outside the box. Creativity often involves trial and error, and the fear of academic consequences can impede this natural learning process.

Emphasis on Right vs. Wrong Answers:

Examinations often reinforce the binary concept of right and wrong answers. This dichotomy can discourage students from exploring nuanced or innovative perspectives, as they may feel pressured to conform to a predefined set of correct responses.

Limited Feedback:

The feedback provided in traditional exams is often limited to a final grade. This lack of detailed feedback can hinder students' understanding of their strengths and weaknesses and limit their ability to learn from their mistakes and improve.

Subjective Nature of Grading:

The subjective nature of grading can also be a source of frustration for students. Creative responses may not always align with the expectations of the examiners, leading to a sense of discouragement and confusion.

While examinations remain a prevalent form of assessment, there is a growing recognition within the education community of the need to complement or reconsider their role in fostering a more holistic and creative approach to learning. Implementing alternative assessment methods that encourage critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity can help address some of these challenges and provide a more enriching educational experience for students.

There are many possibilities regarding future assessments rather than large scale and high pressure summatives.

Some alternatives are provided in the graphics, but some other alternatives are:

1. Formative Assessments: Let's shift our focus to formative assessments as dynamic tools for understanding. These assessments, woven into the fabric of our teaching, provide continuous feedback and opportunities for students to refine their understanding in real-time.

2. Project-Based Learning: The transformative potential of project-based learning lies in its ability to encourage students to apply knowledge in meaningful, real-world contexts. It's a departure from the constraints of traditional exams, fostering creativity, critical thinking, and practical application.

3. Individualized Learning Plans: Recognizing the diversity of our students' interests and learning styles, let's venture into the realm of individualized learning plans. By allowing students to explore topics aligned with their passions, we reignite intrinsic motivation and instill a sense of ownership over their education.

4. Portfolio-Based Outputs: Acknowledging the necessity of grades in our current system, let's integrate portfolio-based outputs as a bridge between traditional assessments and more dynamic evaluation methods. Portfolios offer a comprehensive view of a student's capabilities and progress, embracing a holistic understanding of learning.

In the pursuit of holistic education, there's a world of alternatives waiting to be explored. These methods not only address the downsides of traditional assessments but also pave the way for a more vibrant, engaging, and personalized approach to teaching and learning. The trouble is that traditional education still pervades the world and typical middle and high schools globally.

As we stand at the crossroads of tradition and innovation, let's choose to be the architects of change. By embracing alternatives to large, harsh summative assessments, we can redefine the educational landscape and ensure that our students embark on a journey of discovery that extends far beyond the confines of standardized testing.

Thanks for reading.

Cheers and stay curious

Oliver - The Teaching Astrophysicist


bottom of page